Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 20, 2010, 12:25:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum has been upgraded to SMF 1.1.4. Report any problems via PM to Troy.
37604 Posts in 4468 Topics by 2443 Members
Latest Member: Pelle4495
Search:     Advanced search
+  OQO Talk
|-+  General
| |-+  OQO General (Moderators: sandydlc, stuartguthrie, Pappasan)
| | |-+  A Suggestion on Fan Noise That OQO Might Be Able To Implement Post Production
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: A Suggestion on Fan Noise That OQO Might Be Able To Implement Post Production  (Read 2257 times)
Dave P
Guest
« on: January 21, 2009, 01:19:13 PM »

Like others I am troubled by preliminary reports regarding fan noise in the 02+. May I suggest/request a software solution from OQO.

There are many fan controller programs out there but none which seems compatible with the OQO. If it is possible with the fan and motherboard, could OQO develop a program such as SpeedFan which accesses (and displays) the CPU temprature and allows a finer control over the fan speed than is possible with the current control program?

A major problem with the current control is that it doesn't have a way to specify that the fan should run at lower temperatures and at lower speeds. The lowest speed that the current control uses is too high for a meeting room and the control interface is far too simplistic. I would like an "advanced" section (or separate program) where I could specify a fan scheme (i.e. several instances of "between X and Y degrees run fan at Z RPM").
Logged
adamg
Tech Support Manager
OQO Staff
Full Member
*****
Posts: 110


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2009, 01:43:21 PM »

Forwarded to product dev folks.
Logged

--adam
ecsk2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 260


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2009, 01:46:41 PM »

Thank you for this, as if something (serious) could be done about the fan noise I think I can work around the battery time things, that's more or less the same "for all" these pocketable devices anyhow!

PLEASE OQO give me a FANLESS (or next into) 2+ and I'll be on the OQO bandwagon again Smiley
Logged
2disbetter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2009, 02:33:13 PM »

Just out of curiosity are there any fanless UMPCs out there?

2d
Logged

OQO 02 Best - 1.6, 120gb, Sprint WWAN, Vista Business SP2 DVD-RW Dock - sold
OQO 01, had a 30gb hdd (got lucky) - sold
Nokia N900
Fujitsu P1510D

http://oqoasis.com
jo2k
Newbie
*
Posts: 49


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2009, 03:00:03 PM »

PLEASE OQO give me a FANLESS (or next into) 2+ and I'll be on the OQO bandwagon again Smiley

I am sure OQO wants to be rid of the fan as much as we do...if they could, they would. On the one hand we're crying for performance that could never be good enough, and on the other hand, we want it to be cool and quiet.

Hence, I do applaud for Dave's constructive effort and Adam's attitude.
Logged
j0
Full Member
***
Posts: 222


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2009, 03:36:20 PM »

Another idea is the ability to set the highest fan level.  If the temperature is going higher, it can throttle down the CPU.  That way, I can set the fan at a maximum tolerable noise level so I don't have to worry about the noise coming up all of the sudden.
Logged

OQO 02 1.5GHz 1GB 60GB Vista SP1
Dave P
Guest
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2009, 05:40:19 PM »

Two words for the 03: Peltier cooling.
Logged
Stuart
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 426


Taking Shortcuts Can Hurt


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2009, 06:26:18 PM »

Quote
Two words for the 03: Peltier cooling

And how would you keep the hot side from just heating the whole device up?

With the heat that is generated and the poor cooling characteristics of the case (screen on one surface, battery on the other), there's no easy way to dissapate the heat.  A heat pipe to colling fins for handles (hand warmers) is more likely to work.
Logged

OQO: O2 XP 1.6GHz 64GB SSD, BT Broadband (Samsung SGH-a727)
USB: Targus AVC05EU Webcam, SanDisk MobileMate
BT: Freeedom Keyboard, Kensington SlimBlade Mouse Trackball, Motorla S9 & S705 Headset, Holux GPSlim 236
SW: Garmin Mobile PC, iGuidance, Sling, Office, Visual Studio, Zune, WM Encoder
Dave P
Guest
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2009, 01:51:34 PM »

Quote
Two words for the 03: Peltier cooling

And how would you keep the hot side from just heating the whole device up?

With the heat that is generated and the poor cooling characteristics of the case (screen on one surface, battery on the other), there's no easy way to dissapate the heat.  A heat pipe to colling fins for handles (hand warmers) is more likely to work.

I'd run the heat into the battery case and cut fins in the back of it. It probably wouldn't work well. But, then again, Sony is using the 1.33GHz in their new Vaio because it can run fanless. Maybe there won't be that much heat that needs dissipating.

I like the heat pipe idea. I wonder if you could put them on swivels so that you could move them out of the way?

Logged
vadsoom
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 263



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2009, 05:14:31 PM »

Two words for the 03: Peltier cooling.

Great idea, but how would they port the "hot side." I've though about this and can't think of a way to vent away the heat on the outside and condensation on the inside.... Huh
Logged

02 / Best / XP Tablet / well traveled.
Bungee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 663


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2009, 08:06:57 PM »

I've messed around a little with Peltier Cooling and must say that they results have been disappointing.
The peltier elements doesn't only transport but will also add heat to the elements in the cooling process, making it very inefficient overall. You'd also need to pull quite a bit of current which will inevitably affect battery life. Then, there's also the issue of dealing with the resulting condensation...


Logged

http://oqoasis.com/

OQO e2, 1.5GHz*, 32GB SSD, XP Tablet (*downgrade)
OQO 02, 1.5GHz, 60GB HD, Vista Business
ecsk2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 260


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2009, 01:05:53 AM »

Just out of curiosity are there any fanless UMPCs out there?

2d


Well it's hard to say anymore what is an UMPC and what is a MID, OQO is marketing the OQO 2+ as a MID now..anyhow my Aigo is running XP and it has an Atom processor but no fan, same applies for the UMID MID (which has 1.33Ghz as top model):
http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,3238.0.html

No fan in it either, otherwise the idea of fanless wouldn't even cross my mind!
Logged
ecsk2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 260


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2009, 01:08:32 AM »

PLEASE OQO give me a FANLESS (or next into) 2+ and I'll be on the OQO bandwagon again Smiley

I am sure OQO wants to be rid of the fan as much as we do...if they could, they would. On the one hand we're crying for performance that could never be good enough, and on the other hand, we want it to be cool and quiet.

Hence, I do applaud for Dave's constructive effort and Adam's attitude.

I tend to agree to a certain degree, however I also feel that there are a number of things on the 2+ that are as they are because it's developed from the non Atom based 02, which would be differently if it had been developed from scratch, so maybe on the 03? Smiley

Agree on Adam & Dave!
Logged
ecsk2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 260


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2009, 01:11:54 AM »

Quote
Two words for the 03: Peltier cooling

And how would you keep the hot side from just heating the whole device up?

With the heat that is generated and the poor cooling characteristics of the case (screen on one surface, battery on the other), there's no easy way to dissapate the heat.  A heat pipe to colling fins for handles (hand warmers) is more likely to work.

I'd run the heat into the battery case and cut fins in the back of it. It probably wouldn't work well. But, then again, Sony is using the 1.33GHz in their new Vaio because it can run fanless. Maybe there won't be that much heat that needs dissipating.

I like the heat pipe idea. I wonder if you could put them on swivels so that you could move them out of the way?



From looking around at the Atom based devices you do get the impression that 1.33 is the split anything up to that you can find fanless but above not it seems. However I wouldn't compare the Sony on this subject just because more space/area always changes the possibilities totally, I tend to look at devices only that are truly pocketable just like the OQO. Actually ironically the EEEs which run SSDs and lower processor speeds generally speaking all have fans, so.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Design by 7dana.com

OQO is a registered trademark of OQO, Inc. of San Francisco, CA